"RazoE" (razoe)
11/11/2014 at 11:07 • Filed to: ranchero, el camino
2
4|
"RazoE" (razoe)
11/11/2014 at 11:07 • Filed to: ranchero, el camino | 2
| 4 |
Mustang + S10 does not a Ranchero make.
http://www.carscoops.com/2007/10/1966-f…
itschrome
> RazoE
11/11/2014 at 11:09 |
|
Should have used the Ranger side step bed!! with a Triton V10 upfront!
ACESandEIGHTS
> RazoE
11/11/2014 at 11:21 |
|
Too bad not a long box or it could've been epic. The proportion is bad though.
Brian, The Life of
> RazoE
11/11/2014 at 11:35 |
|
AAYYYIIIEEEEEEE!
::dies::
RamblinRover Luxury-Yacht
> RazoE
11/11/2014 at 11:53 |
|
To the creator of this: GTFAC. If you're going to do this, get an actual fucking '60-'67 Ranchero and blend them. If they're in shitty shape like mine was, you stand good odds of an okay bed but bad passenger compartment for really, really cheap. Longer rear overhang will result - get over it. You've got choices - any of those year segments has a unique way to blend with a Mustang, and every one of them has a body which is a near perfect match - not to mention being designed to the same subframes, similar floorpans, and near identical rockers. '60-'63, you have a continued side relief you just need to borrow the rear door post to match. '64-'65 will look odd and you'll have to modify the front edge a little, but should work well when done. '66-'67 will look like what you've got, only better in every way:
Fuck your modern S-10 bed. Fuck it hard.